Article Sidebar

Submitted
4 April 2020
Accepted
3 July 2020
Published
31 May 2020
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 3561 Download : 13853

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

User experience describes the experience gained by users when using software products. Focus on the needs and emotions of users when using a product is one of the keys to the success of a software. As a software product, Student Academic Information Systems have an important role to improve services to students in Higher Education. Measurement of user experience aims to determine the experience gained by users when using the Student Academic Information System. Measurements were made using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) on 179 active student of a higher education institution in Pekanbaru. The results obtained for each aspect of UEQ are 1.395 attractiveness, 1.586 clarity, 1.380 efficiency, 1.392 accuracy, 1,347 stimulation and 0.847 novelty. The lowest value is in the novelty aspect. The novelty aspect needs to be a concern because users feel the monotonous and usual novelty so that it has a negative impression value. The results of this study can be used as recommendations for designing a new Student Academic Information System user experience.

Keywords

user experience, Student Academic Information System, UEQ user experience, sistem informasi akademik mahasiswa, UEQ

Article Details

How to Cite
Henim, S. R., & Sari, R. P. (2020). User Experience Evaluation of Student Academic Information System of Higher Education Using User Experience Questionnaire. Jurnal Komputer Terapan, 6(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.35143/jkt.v6i1.3582
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bevan, N. (2014, August). What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods. In Proceedings of the Workshop UXEM (Vol. 9).
  2. F. Z. Ridwan, D. Hardianto, and Y. G. Sucahyo, “Analisa Usability untuk Mengetahui User Experience Pada Aplikasi Berbasis Web,†Konf. Nas. Sist. dan Inform., pp. 186–191, 2008.
  3. Garrett, Jesse James. (2011). The Elements of User Experience: User Centered Design for The Web and Beyond, 2ed. Amerika: New Riders.
  4. H. B. Santoso, M. Schrepp, R. Y. K. Isal, A. Y. Utomo, and B. Priyogi, “Measuring User Experience of the Student-Centered e-Learning Environment,†J. Educ. Online, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 58–79, 2016.
  5. Intanny, Vieka Aprilya., Widiyastuti, Inasari ., Perdani , Maria Dolorosa Kusuma., “Pengukuran Kebergunaan dan Pengalaman Pengguna Marketplace Jogjaplaza.id dengan Metode UEQ dan USE Questionnaireâ€, Jurnal Pekommas, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 117–126, Oktober 2018.
  6. Rery Audilla Putri, Silvana Rasio Henim dan Rika Perdana Sari. (2018). “Analisis Usability Existing Product dan Development Product Pada E-Commerce dengan Metode User Centered Design,†Jurnal SATIN-Sains dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 93-99, 2018
  7. Schrepp, M, A.Hiderks & J. Thomaschewski, “Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ),†International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 40-44, 2017.
  8. Schrepp, M. (2015). User Experience Questionnaire Handbook. Germany.
  9. Sproll, S., Peissner, M., & Sturm, C. (2010). From Product Concept to User Experience: Exploring UX Potentials at Early Product Stages. 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (pp. 473-482). Reykjavik, Iceland: ACM.
  10. Wulandari, Irma Rofni., Farida, Lilis Dwi., “Pengukuran User Experience Pada E-Learning di Lingkungan Universitas Menggunakan User Experience Questionnare (UEQ),†Jurnal Mantik Penusa, vol. 2, no. 2, 2018.