Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 25, 2018
Accepted
May 14, 2018
Published
May 31, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 363 Download : 334

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is aimed to examine effect of tax rate, taxation technology and information, possibility of fraud detection, and tax fairness on taxpayer perception of tax fraud ethics. This research uses primary data by questioners. Data are analyzed by using multiple regression with 105 respondents of individual taxpayers (wajib pajak orang pribadi) listed in Kantor Pelayanan Pajak  (KPP) Pratama Senapelan Pekanbaru, KPP Dumai Kota, KPP Rokan Hilir, Riau, Indonesia. Results show that tax rate has effect on taxpayer perception of tax fraud ethics, taxation technology and information has effect on taxpayer perception of tax fraud ethics, possibility of fraud detection has effect on taxpayer perception of tax fraud ethics, tax fairness has effect on taxpayer perception of tax fraud ethics.Keywords: tax rate, taxation technology and information, fraud, fairness, purposive sampling.

Keywords

tax rate taxation technology and information fraud fairness purposive sampling.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors hold the copyright in any process, procedure, or article described in the work and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    2. Authors retain publishing rights to re-use all or portion of the work in different work but can not granting third-party requests for reprinting and republishing the work.

    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

References

  1. Andres, Luis. 2002. “Determinants of Propensity to Tax Evasion: The Argentinean Caseâ€. University of Chichago
  2. Chairil Anwar Pohan, 2013 “Manajemen Perpajakan [Taxation Management]“, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama,Jakarta.
  3. Hilgard, Ernest Ropiquet, and Rita L. Atkinson. 1979. 7th Edition. Introduction to Psychology. New York : Harcourt Brace Jocanovich
  4. Ayu, Dyah dan Rini Hastuti. 2009. Persepsi Wajib Pajak Dampak Pertentangan Diametral Pada Tax Evasion Wajib Pajak Dalam Aspek Kemungkinan Terdeteksinya Kecurangan, Keadilan, Ketepatan Pengalokasian, Teknologi Sistem Perpajakan, dan Kecenderungan Personal (Studi WP Orang Pribadi) [Taxpayer Perception of Impact of Diametric Conflict on Tax Evasion by Taxpayer in Possibility of Fraud Detection, Fairness, Allocation Accuracy, Taxation System Technology, and Personality Tendency Aspects (Study of Individual Taxpayer)]. Kajian akuntansi. Volume 1, Nomor 1, Februari 2009
  5. Mardiasmo. 2009. Perpajakan [Taxation] Edisi Revisi 2009. Yogyakarta, Penerbit Andi.
  6. Pandiangan, Liberti. (2007). Modernisasi & Reformasi Pelayanan Perpajakan [Modernization and Reformation of Taxation Service]. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo
  7. Permatasari, Laksito. 2013. Minimalisasi Tax Evasion Melalui Tarif Pajak, Teknologi dan Informasi Perpajakan, Keadilan Sistem Perpajakan, dan Ketetapan Pengalokasian Pengeluaran Pemerintah [Tax Evasion Minimization by Tax Rate, Taxation Technology and Information, Taxation System Fairness, and Government Expenditure Allocation Accuracy]. Journal Of Accounting, Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013.
  8. Rahman. 2013. Pengaruh Keadilan, Sistem Perpajakan, Diskriminasi, Dan Kemungkinan Terdeteksi Kecurangan Terhadap Persepsi Wajib Pajak Mengenai Etika Penggelapan Pajak (Tax Evasion) [Effect of Fairness, Taxation System, Discrimination, and Possibility of Fraud Detection on Taxpayer Perception of Tax Fraud Ethics (Tax Evasion)]. Jakarta. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
  9. Rawls, John.1971. A Theory of Justice, dalam Chapter II The Principle of Justice. Publisher: the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts. Tersedia: www.wahyudi.djafar.web.id. Diakses 14 Desember 2013.
  10. Sugiono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D [Research Method of Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D]. Bandung, Alfabeta.
  11. Suminarsasi, Wahyu dan Supriyadi. 2011. Pengaruh Keadilan, Sistem Perpajakan dan Diskriminasi Terhadap Persepsi Wajib Pajak Mengenai Penggelapan Pajak [Effect of Fairness, Taxation System, and Discrimination on Taxpayer Perception of Tax Fraud Ethics].
  12. Waluyo,2010.Perpajakan Indonesia [Taxation of Indonesia]. Jakarta, Salemba Empat.