Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 16, 2024
Accepted
June 16, 2025
Published
June 20, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 145 Download : 94

Main Article Content

Abstract

Auditor psychological factors may limit the auditor’s cognitive ability to make professional judgments. It shows that even though the auditor has perfomed the audit work professionally and in accordance with auditing standards, misjudgments may still occur. This research aims to determine auditors’ psychological determinant that may affect auditors’ professional judgment. Self-efficacy and skepticism are the psychological factors that will be examined for their influence on auditors’ professional judgment. This study uses Individual Psychology by Alfred Adler as grand theory to explain the relationship between variables. This is a causal study using quantitative data types and primary data sources. Auditors working at registered KAP in South Jakarta based on the directory of IAPI directory 2024 are the population of this study. The data was collected by distributing questionnaire to respondents who meet the criteria. The samples were obtained with a total of 92 samples using purposive sampling method. The data analysis method uses multiple linear regression, and then processed using IBM SPSS version 26. The results show that self-efficacy and skepticism, partially and simultaneously, have positive and significant effect on auditors’ professional judgment

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Christina Christina, Fadiyah Husna Afraini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors hold the copyright in any process, procedure, or article described in the work and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    2. Authors retain publishing rights to re-use all or portion of the work in different work but can not granting third-party requests for reprinting and republishing the work.

    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

References

  1. Adler, A. (2023). Memahami Diri Sendiri dan Orang Lain (R. Edink, Ed.). IRCiSoD.
  2. Anas, F. A. (2020). Pengaruh Karakteristik Profesionalisme Auditor terhadap Audit Judgement dengan Spriritual Quetient sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi pada Inspektorat Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan) [Akuntansi]. Universitas Islam Negeri Alaudin.
  3. Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2015). Audit & Jasa Assurance Edisi Kelimabelas (S. Saat, Ed.; 15 ed.). Penerbit Erlangga.
  4. Cicilia, T., & Sofian, S. (2022). Pengaruh Locus of Cotrol, Self Efficacy, Job Stress dan Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 11(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.33508/jima.v11i2.4571
  5. Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 26 Edisi 10 (10 ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  6. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar Audit 200 (Revisi 2021) Tujuan Keseluruhan Auditor Independen dan Pelaksanaan Audit berdasarkan Standar Audit. IAPI. http://www.iapi.or.id
  7. Islamic, G. P. (2019). Pengaruh Locus of Control, Skeptisme Profesional, dan Independensi terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 3(2), 1–21.
  8. Kishimi, I., & Koga, F. (2019). Berani Tidak Disukai. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  9. Korompis, C. W. M. (2019). Perkembangan Pertimbangan Profesional Auditor dan Kualitas Audit. Journal of Technopreneurship on Economics and Business Review, 1(1), 1–13. https://jtebr.unisan.ac.id
  10. Purnomo, H. (2018, Oktober 1). Konkret! Buntut Kasus SNP, Kantor Akuntan Ini Disanksi OJK. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20181001163138-4-35527/konkret-buntut-kasus-snp-kantor-akuntan-ini-disanksi-ojk
  11. Semiun, Y. (2020). Teori-Teori Kepribadian Behavioristik (U. Prastya, Ed.). PT Kanisius.
  12. Sumartono, Ermawati, Y., & Rorong, T. M. (2022). Influence of experience and professional skepticism on audit judgement of government external auditors. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol26.i
  13. Wahyuni, A., & Widaryanti, W. (2023). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Self-Efficacy Terhadap Audit Judgement dengan Variabel Kompleksitas Tugas Sebagai Pemoderasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Aset, 25(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.37470/1.25.2.222
  14. Widiantari, N. K. S., Rustiarini, N. W., & Dewi, N. P. S. (2022). Pengaruh Locus Of Control, Self Esteem, Skeptisme, Ethical Sensitivity, Dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Audit Judgment Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Bali. Jurnal KARMA, 2(1), 2158–2169.