Article Sidebar

Submitted
17 September 2021
Accepted
30 November 2021
Published
30 November 2021
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 382 Download : 365

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Technology plays an important role in everyday life for many people. Then, the problem that arises is the use of technology that is not appropriate and misuses it for personal interests, giving rise to cyber crimes such as drug transactions. The existence of digital evidence can assist in uncovering cases of cyber crimes using digital evidence of sound recordings. Therefore, this research is expected to reveal these cyber crimes. Efforts to analyze sound recordings are carried out using audio forensic techniques to show ownership of voices so that they can be used as evidence. A minimum of 20 words are required that have similarities between the voice of the evidence and the voice of the subject. From the results of the study, it was found that sample A had identical words with evidence of more than 20 words. Sample A has 21 identical words in pitch analysis, 5 words in ANOVA statistical analysis, 26 words in graphical distribution analysis and 24 words in spectrogram analysis of the 30 words analyzed. It can be concluded that audio forensic techniques can show ownership of sound recordings with the results of voice recordings of sample A being identical to the evidence

Keywords

Audio Forensik Barang Bukti Digital Rekaman Suara Audio Forensik Pitch Formant Spectrogram Voice Recognition

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
hendra, hendra, & rasio henim, silvana. (2021). Teknik Audio Forensik untuk Analisis Rekaman Suara sebagai Barang Bukti Digital. Jurnal Komputer Terapan, 7(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.35143/jkt.v7i2.4981
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ashari, “Peranan Barang Bukti dalam Proses Perkara Pidana,†vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2017.
  2. M. N. Al-Azhar, “Digital Forensic Practical Guidelines for Computer Investigation,†2012.
  3. Republik Indonesia, “Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik,†Lembaran Negara Republik Indones. Tahun 2016 Nomor 251, pp. 1689–1699, 2016.
  4. & H. Huizen, Jayanti, “Model Evaluasi Rekaman Percakapan Di Audio Forensik,†pp. 133–140, 2017.
  5. A. Aligarh and B. C. Hidayanto, “Implementasi Metode Forensik dengan Menggunakan Pitch, Formant, dan Spectrogram untuk Analisis Kemiripan Suara Melalui Perekam Suara Telepon Genggam Pada Lingkungan yang Bervariasi,†J. Tek. ITS, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v5i2.16980.
  6. H. Septiansyah, “the Implementation of Forensic Method on Men Using Voice Voice Resemblance Towards Mobile Phone ’ S Voice Recorder,†2015.
  7. N. Hasnah, “Analisis Rekaman Suara Barang Bukti Digital Menggunakan Metode Audio Forensik,†p. 121, 2018.
  8. A. Subki, B. Sugiantoro, and Y. Prayudi, “Membandingkan Tingkat Kemiripan Rekaman Voice Changer Menggunakan Analisis Pitch, Formant dan Spectrogram,†J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 17, 2018, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.201851500.
  9. U. Rusydi, “Analisis Statistik Manipulasi Pitch Suara Menggunakan Audio Forensik Untuk Bukti Digital,†J. Mob. Forensics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/mf/article/view/702.
  10. B. S. Deva and I. Mardianto, “Teknik Audio Forensik Menggunakan Metode Analisis Formant Bandwidth, Pitch dan Analisis Likelihood Ratio,†Ultimatics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 67–72, 2019, doi: 10.31937/ti.v10i2.936.