Main Article Content

Abstract

Technological advancement provides the biggest impact on the administration and information delivery system in hospitals. The adoption of a Paperless policy by hospitals demands that all activities involving information delivery to be done digitally. The availability of relevant media such as smartphones serve to support the adoption of such a policy. Patients who required the services of the Radiology Facility used to be given printed rontgen images to assist their doctors in their diagnosis, but with the emergence of digitalization, the patients are now provided with digital images that are distributed via WhatsApp. Such a method can also be applied to Radiograph interpretation, where information can be delivered remotely through the usage of PACs and/or WhatsApp. The interpretation standard for radiographs utilizes the DICOM Viewer, which means that recent social media developments offer an increased ease of access to the interpretation process by way of WhatsApp. The image that is sent via WhatsApp typically gets compressed, which consequently causes a loss of information in the image. This study aims to compare doctor’s opinions and image quality viewed between WhatsApp and DICOM viewer. This study is a quanitative comparative study through documentation, observation, and data collecting questionnaire. The study found that the image that was sent using WhatsApp suffered a decrease in size and pixel quantity. Therefore, the anatomical information provided by the two radiographs were different.

Keywords

Pixel size Anatomy Information DICOM Viewer Whatsapp

Article Details

Author Biographies

Tengku Mohammad Yoshandi, Universitas Awal Bros

Department of Radiology Technology Awal Bros University

Abdul Zaky, Awal Bros University

Department of Computer Engineering Awal Bros University

Annisa Mahfuyana, Awal Bros University

Department of Radiology Technology Awal Bros University
How to Cite
Yoshandi, T. M., Zaky, A., & Mahfuyana, A. (2023). The Comparison of Pixel Size and Anatomy Information of Radiograph Digital Image using DICOM viewer and Whatsapp. Jurnal Komputer Terapan, 9(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.35143/jkt.v9i2.5942

References

  1. S. Angella, M. Bisra, L. Wahyuni, R. M. Gustia, H. Hidayat, and R. Kusnita, “Role of radiographer in health sector at Senior High School Bagan Siapi-api,” Awal Bros Journal of Community Development, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ojs.stikesawalbrospekanbaru.ac.id/index.php/abjcd/article/view/31
  2. T. M. Yoshandi, S. Angella, T. Radiologi, S. Awal, and B. Pekanbaru, “Education To High School Student About Radiographer’S Role in Handling Covid-19 in Hospital,” Ojs.Stikesawalbrospekanbaru.Ac.Id, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.stikesawalbrospekanbaru.ac.id/index.php/abjcd/article/view/99
  3. W. Syahputra, “Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Dicom Viewer yang Terintegrasi dengan PACS,” Universitas Dinamika, 2014.
  4. H. K. Huang, PACS and Imaging Informatics: Basic Principle and Applications, 2nd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/PACS+and+Imaging+Informatics:+Basic+Principles+and+Applications,+2nd+Edition-p-9780470373729
  5. B. Gibaud, “The DICOM standard: A brief overview,” NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics, no. January 2008, pp. 229–238, 2008, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8752-3_13.
  6. O. Schultze, J. Greyling, M. Hayes, and S. Andronikou, “Talking PACS: Part 1 - What is PACS?,” South African Journal of Radiology, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 50, 2007, doi: 10.4102/sajr.v11i3.31.
  7. Keith. J. Dreyer, David. S. Hirschorn, James. H. Thrall, and A. Mehta, PACS: A Guide to the Digital Revolution second edition, 2nd ed. Springer Science+Busines Media, Inc., 2006.
  8. L. F. Maifil, “Perbaikan Kualitas Citra medis Menggunakan Metode Difusi Nonlinear Anisotropik,” Universitas Andalas, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://scholar.unand.ac.id/id/eprint/30759
  9. N. T. Budiansyah, “Studi kinerja metode lossy compression pada citra medis menggunakan algoritma kompresi berbasis fraktal dan wavelet,” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2017.
  10. D. S. Pathentantama, I. M. O. Widyantara, and R. S. Hartati, “Analisis Kualitas Citra Medis Terkompresi JPEG,” Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro, vol. 18, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.24843/mite.2019.v18i02.p12.
  11. M. A. Maricar and O. Widyantara, “Pemampatan Citra Pas Foto dengan Menggunakan Algoritma Kompresi Joint-Photograpic Experts Group (JPEG) dan Principal Component Analysis (PCA),” Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 102, May 2018, doi: 10.24843/mite.2018.v17i01.p14.
  12. L. J. Strauss and W. I. Rae, “Image quality dependence on image processing software in computed radiography,” South African Journal of Radiology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 44–48, 2012, doi: 10.4102/sajr.v16i2.305.
  13. A. Parikh and N. Mehta, “PACS on mobile devices,” Medical Imaging 2015: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations, vol. 9418.94180, 2015, doi: 10.1117/12.2081557.
  14. R. Maghfira, Wilcoxon Test, Dependent Test And Independent Test. 2019. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34721.07525