Article Sidebar

Submitted
27 February 2023
Accepted
22 June 2023
Published
28 June 2023
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 118 Download : 86

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

School libraries should be accredited with the aim of improving the quality of libraries. Pekanbaru City Library and Archives Service (DISPUSIP) in determining a school library that deserves to be accredited is still done manually, namely DISPUSIP went directly to the field to monitor the library in the school and the data collection still used manual entries. Meanwhile, a lot of data must be collected, causing the data to be inaccurate and take a long time. For this reason, a decision support system  is needed. The data used are nine junior high schools both public and private as an alternative. While the criteria refer to the school library accreditation instrument issued by the National Library consisting of six criteria, namely collections, library facilities and infrastructure, library services, library staff, library administration and management, and reinforcement. Data analysis using the ARAS method. The results of the study are that Sek 4, Sek 5 and Sek 2 are school libraries that are eligible for accreditation

Keywords

Akreditasi, Metode ARAS, Perpustakaan, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Akreditasi Metode ARAS Perpustakaan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Sukamto, UNIVERSITAS RIAU

Sistem Informasi, FMIPA, Universitas Riau

Elfizar, Universitas Riau

Sistem Informasi, FMIPA, Universitas Riau

Roni Salambue, Universitas Riau

Sistem Informasi, FMIPA, Universitas Riau

Aidil Fitriansyah, Universitas Riau

Sistem Informasi, FMIPA, Universitas Riau

Evfi Mahdiyah, Universitas Riau

Sistem Informasi, FMIPA, Universitas Riau
How to Cite
Sukamto, Elfizar, Salambue, R., Fitriansyah, A., & Mahdiyah, E. (2023). Penerapan Metode ARAS untuk Menentukan Kelayakan Perpustakaan Sekolah Diakreditasi. Jurnal Komputer Terapan, 9(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.35143/jkt.v9i1.5882
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. T. R. Sitompul and N. A. Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Tenaga Kerja Untuk Security Service Menggunakan Metode Aras,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.30865/mib.v2i1.812.
  2. Sukamto, Y. Andriyani, and I. D. Id, “Aplikasi Metode VIKOR untuk Menentukan Penerimaan Proposal Kegiatan Desa,” Komput. Terap., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 336–345, 2022.
  3. C. Maulana, A. Hendrawan, and A. P. R. Pinem, “Pemodelan Penentuan Kredit Simpan Pinjam Menggunakan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras),” J. Pengemb. Rekayasa dan Teknol., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 7, 2019, doi: 10.26623/jprt.v15i1.1483.
  4. A. Supriatna, D. Dedih, and Y. Yanitasari, “Pemilihan Departemen Terbaik dengan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 228–235, 2020, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v12i3.679.228-235.
  5. S. R. Cholil and E. S. Prisiswo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Karyawan Baru PT. Dawam Prima Perkasa Menggunakan Metode Aras Berbasis Web,” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 7, p. 107, 2020, doi: 10.25124/jrsi.v7i2.422.
  6. J. Hutagalung and M. T. Indah R, “Pemilihan Dosen Penguji Skripsi Menggunakan Metode ARAS, COPRAS dan WASPAS,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 354–367, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i3.1240.
  7. D. Simarmata, “Implementasi Metode Additive Ratio Assesment (Aras) Untuk Rekomendasi Pasien Kunjungan Sehat Pada Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama Dr Josepb Nugroho H,” Coding J. Komput. dan Apl., vol. 07, no. 03, pp. 109–119, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jcskommipa/article/view/37171
  8. E. Ndruru and E. N. Purba, “Penerapan Metode ARAS Dalam Pemilihan Lokasi Objek Wisata Yang Terbaik Pada Kabupaten Nias Selatan,” METHOMIKA J. Manaj. Inform. Komputerisasi Akunt., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 151–159, 2019.
  9. E. Febrianto, I. Kanedi, and D. Sartika, “Implementasi Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) Untuk Seleksi Siswa Berprestasi Smk Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu,” J. Media Infotama, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 382–391, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/jmi/article/view/2998%0Ahttps://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/jmi/article/download/2998/2612
  10. A. Anas, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Desa Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras),” Simtek J. Sist. Inf. dan Tek. Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2019, doi: 10.51876/simtek.v4i1.42.
  11. S. Bakri and H. Haerudin, “Penerapan Metode Aras (Additive Rasio Assement) Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Terbaik,” OKTAL J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sains, vol. 1, no. 06, pp. 641–648, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/oktal/article/view/541%0Ahttps://journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/oktal/article/download/541/199
  12. D. Wahyuningsih, H. Hamidah, A. Anisah, D. Irawan, O. Rizan, and C. Kirana, “Seleksi Peserta Didik Baru Dengan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 120–126, 2022, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v11i1.1381.
  13. J. Hutagalung, B. Anwar, and I. Santoso, “Implementasi Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Untuk Menentukan Siswa Terbaik,” Techno.Com, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 462–474, 2022, doi: 10.33633/tc.v21i3.6148.
  14. Perpustakaan Nasional and Republik Indonesia, “Instrumen Akreditasi Perpustakaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah,” -, vol., no. 8, pp. 1–22, 2018.