Main Article Content

Abstract

Spring water is a human need for daily life. One of the benefits is to irrigate agricultural land. Agricultural land in Semarang Regency dried up every dry season in the last few years. Semarang Regency local government had identified 8 areas as the candidate of small dam construction locations for short term priority. The selection of small dam locations becomes a special issue in data processing in the Water Resources Sector which has many criteria to be aware of.  The obtained data can be stored in database of GIS. Therefore,  decision support system is needed to determine the best small dams priority. The method used in this system is the TOPSIS. Data that has been processed will be implemented to determine the best small dams priority in a region and displayed visually using Carto Map. System are built using the Codeigniter framework based PHP and MySQL database. In its implementation, the Rapid Application Development (RAD) method is used. Based on the calculation results obtained the first three sequences that have the largest live storage and the lowest water cost that can be prioritized are Mluweh, Lebak, and Pakis.

Keywords

SIG TOPSIS RAD Embung GIS TOPSIS RAD Small Dams

Article Details

Author Biography

Kornelius Satria Budiyanto, Universitas Diponegoro

Departemen Teknik Komputer, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro
How to Cite
Budiyanto, K. S., Pertiwi Windasari, I. ., Eko Windarto, Y. ., & Ulfiana, D. . (2020). Sistem Informasi Geografis berbasis Web untuk Penentuan Prioritas Pembangunan Embung. Jurnal Komputer Terapan , 6(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.35143/jkt.v6i2.3642

References

  1. S. Munir, “Bergantung pada Embung di Musim Kemarau,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://regional.kompas.com/read/2015/08/24/18514461/Bergantung.pada.Embung.di.Musim.Kemarau. [Accessed: 18-Nov-2019].
  2. Peraturan Bupati Semarang Nomor 43 Tahun 2019 Tentang Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Semarang Tahun 2020. Indonesia, 2020.
  3. B. Anjasmoro, Suharyanto, and S. Sangkawati, “Analisis Prioritas Pembangunan Embung Metode Cluster Analysis , AHP dan Weighted Average (Studi Kasus : Embung di Kabupaten Semarang),” J. Ilmu dan Terap. Bid. Tek. Sipil, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2015.
  4. D. Herawatie and E. Wuryanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi dengan Metode Fuzzy TOPSIS,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 92, 2017.
  5. H. Adrianto, “Lumbung Air sebagai Alternatif Penyediaan Air Baku Perkotaan (Studi Kasus: Analisis Penentuan Prioritas Lokasi Embung),” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Dalam Pengembangan SmartCity, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 295–308.
  6. P. M. Nirwana, “Penyusunan Prioritas Program Rehabilitasi Embung di Kabupaten Malang Provinsi Jawa Timur,” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2016.
  7. V. Jain, A. K. Sangaiah, S. Sakhuja, N. Thoduka, and R. Aggarwal, “Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 555–564, 2018.
  8. D. R. Sari, A. P. Windarto, D. Hartama, and S. Solikhun, “Decision Support System for Thesis Graduation Recommendation Using AHP-TOPSIS Method,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018.
  9. B. Cayir Ervural, S. Zaim, O. F. Demirel, Z. Aydin, and D. Delen, “An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 82, no. April 2016, pp. 1538–1550, 2018.
  10. A. A. Chamid and A. C. Murti, “Kombinasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” in Snatif, 2017, pp. 115–119.
  11. R. A.S. and M. Shalahuddin, Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak (Terstruktur dan Berorientasi Objek), 4th ed. Informatika Bandung, 2016.
  12. H. Alathas, “How to Measure Product Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) Score,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://uxplanet.org/how-to-measure-product-usability-with-the-system-usability-scale-sus-score-69f3875b858f. [Accessed: 11-May-2020].